This school year has been a preponderance of pilots and beta testing. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a tech geek and I’m very appreciative of my forward-thinking school district. I am also extremely appreciative to have the freedom and flexibility to beta test new technology that may positively affect my students’ engagement in learning. This year, by my own choice or district curriculum options, I have been introducing, testing, or using a multitude of new tech or curriculum.
As a middle science teacher, I piloted and incorporated the following curriculum:
- Project Guts – Code.org computer science in science
- Amplify – middle school science curriculum
- IQWEST – middle school science curriculum
- Minecraft Education Edition – fostering student creativity & anything actually
- PASTL – fostering students to think and process science visually in conversations
As a geeky tech teacher, I piloted and incorporated the following new educational technology:
- Microsoft Classroom (will be changing to Microsoft Teams for Education)
- OneNote – OneNote app compared to the 2016 OneNote desktop app
- Lifeliqe – 3D models and augmented reality
- FlipGrid – amplifying student voice captured within video responses
- Slack – team group communications
- Microsoft Paint 3D – making and modeling objects and art in 3D
- Synergy – student information and gradebook application
- Whiteboard Preview – whiteboard writing meets digital sharing technology
What did I learn?
What I learned is when educational curriculum and technology is chosen wisely, it can foster student creativity, amplify student voice, and streamline student collaboration. This is important; as our classrooms have changed, the demands and distractions on learning have changed. I believe students want to learn, but just like adults, they want the learning to be authentic and they want to have a voice in their learning.
We will be choosing curriculum companies that have integrated technology that easily navigates concepts, assessments, and simulations. For the traditional textbook based curriculum companies who are just transferring the text to an online format, please don’t bother… it is not worth our time. Piloting new curriculum and/or technology requires “beta” teachers to quickly assess how big the learning curve will be for both teachers and students. The more input the curriculum companies and/or technology companies listen to from teachers, the better. The demands of the classroom require an easy to figure out format for both curriculum and technology applications. Since we’re piloting new curriculum and new technology, we appreciate when our feedback is listened to. We appreciate when we see updates that reflect our feedback. We’re all wanting the same thing, we want an authentic learning platform and we want our voices to be heard in our learning.
*Stay tuned for follow up posts for specific details for piloted curriculum and/or technology